Advertisement
The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 26, Article number: 189 (2025)
1600
1
Metrics details
Lifestyle modifications and coping with migraine triggers have a crucial role in migraine management. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of patients with migraine about triggers, managing strategies for these triggers, and the counselling provided by physicians regarding these topics.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of migraine through an online survey to assess their knowledge of common migraine triggers, whether the healthcare provider had discussed migraine triggers or recommended lifestyle modifications, and strategies followed to manage migraine triggers.
Five hundred fifteen patients with migraines responded to the survey, with a median age of thirty-one years. Only 43% thought they had sufficient knowledge about migraine triggers. Stress got the highest awareness level (93.4%), followed by sleep-related issues. About 40% of participants were aware of certain food triggers. While 63.1% of participants said their physicians had addressed lifestyle changes to help reduce migraines, only 28.3% reported actively managing their migraine triggers. The most frequently discussed aspect was sleep hygiene improvements (78.1%), followed by stress management techniques (68.7%), and dietary modifications (59.8%). Regarding the approaches applied for migraine management, following a consistent sleep schedule, stress management techniques, and a specific diet were reported by 54.0%, 49. 5%, and 34.0%, respectively. Moreover, only 18% keep a detailed migraine diary to track their triggers.
Addressing migraine triggers and coping strategies should be integrated into migraine management to reduce reliance on medications and activate personalized plans to optimize outcomes.
Peer Review reports
Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurological condition with substantial social, economic, and occupational impact. It is characterized by a complex, multifactorial neurobiology involving a series of interactions within both the central and peripheral nervous systems [1, 2].
Clinical observations and electrophysiological studies indicate that individuals with migraines have heightened brain sensitivity compared to those without the condition [3, 4]. Even between migraine attacks, they often experience an increased sensitivity to various sensory inputs [5]. One possible explanation for this altered neurological state is a lack of habituation in the brain of migraine patients [5,6,7]. Consequently, certain internal or external factors, known as triggers, are thought to precipitate migraine headaches in a brain that is already in a sensitized state [5]. Despite individual differences in migraine triggers, several are consistently recognized as common among those affected. These triggers include stress, certain foods, hormonal changes, sleep disturbances, weather variations, and sensory stimuli. However, migraine attacks can still occur without any identifiable trigger [5].
Prodromal symptoms and triggers likely share an interrelated relationship, with many prodromal features potentially being misidentified as triggers. The role of these triggers in migraine remains a topic of ongoing debate [8, 9]. However, lifestyle modifications and trigger avoidance, along with other non-pharmacological interventions such as stress management and cognitive behavioral therapy, represent accessible and cost-effective strategies for individuals with migraine [10,11,12,13]. Woldeamanuel et al. [10] found that individuals with chronic migraine are significantly less likely to engage in regular lifestyle behaviors such as maintaining consistent sleep, exercise, mealtime patterns, and hydration compared to those with episodic migraine, suggesting that these behaviors may have a protective effect. Such approaches offer a practical means of reducing reliance on acute medications and may help prevent both medication-overuse headache and headache chronification, conditions associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs [11].
Most existing global and regional studies have focused on patients’ self-reported triggers and how they personally cope with migraine episodes [12,13,14,15]. However, few studies have directly assessed migraine sufferers’ overall knowledge of common triggers and their ability to recognize them. For example, Baldacci et al. [14] found that although 72.5% of patients could name at least one trigger on their own, all patients (100%) were able to recognize at least one trigger when given a list of common options, suggesting limited spontaneous awareness of trigger factors. This gap between recognition and recall indicates that migraine patients may not fully understand or be aware of the range of possible triggers affecting them.
Furthermore, to our knowledge, no studies have systematically evaluated whether healthcare providers discuss migraine triggers and coping strategies with patients, an important aspect of patient education and management.
The current study aimed to assess the knowledge of a sample of migraine patients regarding migraine triggers, strategies for managing these triggers, and the information provided by physicians about potential triggers and effective management approaches.
This study used a cross-sectional descriptive design. An online survey was employed to assess the knowledge of migraine triggers among a sample of Egyptian migraine patients. Participants aged 18 or older were recruited from migraine support social media groups.
The survey was administered via Google Forms. The link to the survey was shared within Egyptian migraine support social media groups on Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram. The survey remained open between 1 st February and 1 st April 2025 to ensure a sufficient response rate. Reminder posts were periodically shared within the groups to encourage participation.
At the start of the survey, participants were asked to respond to screening questions “Have you been formally diagnosed with migraine by a healthcare professional more than one year ago?” and “Are you a healthcare professional?”. Only participants who answered “Yes” to the first question and “No” to the second question were allowed to proceed to other questions. Those who did not were directed to submit the form. After this, an informed consent statement was displayed. Participants were also instructed to complete the questionnaire independently, relying solely on their own knowledge, without consulting external sources or seeking assistance.
The questionnaire was provided in Arabic and was structured into several sections designed to assess various aspects of migraine trigger knowledge and management:1) Demographic Information, including age, gender, and age at onset; 2) Knowledge of common migraine triggers: Questions aimed at assessing participants’ awareness of common triggers such as stress, food, sleep, etc., 3) Healthcare Provider Interaction: Questions about whether healthcare providers had discussed migraine triggers or suggested lifestyle modifications, and 4) Personal Strategies to manage migraine triggers: A question regarding the management strategies used by participants, including medication and lifestyle adjustments (see appendix I).
The study protocol adhered to the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University Research Ethical Committee (FMBSUREC/01062025/Abdelazeem).
Participants were informed about the voluntary nature of their participation, the confidentiality of their responses, and the right to withdraw at any stage without consequence. Informed consent was obtained before they began the survey.
The sample size was calculated using EpiCalc 2000, version 1.02, 1997. Because 100% of migraine patients were reported by Baldacci et al. [14] to know at least 1 migraine trigger (selected from a specific list), calculation of the sample size was done based on 10% prevalence rate of migraine [16], a null hypothesis of 15%, and an alpha level of significance of 0.05, a total sample size of at least 469 participants was required to achieve a statistical power of 90%.
Data were analysed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test the normality of data. Quantitative data, such as age and age of onset, were expressed as median (IQR). Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages.
Five hundred and fifteen individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of migraine were surveyed. Their median age was 31, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 23–40. Most of them were females (81.9%), while males constituted about 18.1%. Detailed demographic data of the included patients are illustrated in Table 1.
Although 58.3% of the participants acknowledged that their physicians had discussed migraine triggers with them, only 43% thought they had sufficient knowledge about migraine triggers.
About 40% of the patients were aware of certain food triggers, such as aged cheese, chocolate, processed meats, caffeinated beverages, artificial sweeteners, and pickled and fermented foods. However, a much lower number recognized nuts and citrus fruits as migraine triggers (16.5% and 6.4%, respectively) (Table 2).
Certain sleep-related issues were identified as migraine triggers by most participants, including undersleeping, irregular sleep schedules, and frequent awakenings during the night. Yet, oversleeping as a migraine trigger was less familiar, as reported by only 41.6% (Table 2).
In terms of hormone-related issues, most participants were aware of the impactful effect of the menstrual cycle and hormonal medications (72.4% and 60.0%, respectively). On the other hand, 39.6% and 44.7% thought that pregnancy and menopause might impact migraine (Table 2).
Notably, the highest level of awareness of headache triggers was recorded with stress (93.4%). Moreover, physical exertion, dehydration, and missing meals or fasting were recognized by 83.3%, 61.4%, and 62.7%, respectively. However, only 55.9% identified smoking as a migraine trigger (Table 2).
Three hundred twenty-five participants (63.1%) acknowledged that their physician discussed lifestyle changes that may improve their migraines. The most frequently discussed aspect was sleep hygiene improvements, as reported by 78.1%, followed by stress management techniques (68.7%), dietary modifications (59.8%), and exercise recommendations (53.4%) (Table 3).
Upon asking about approaches applied for migraine management, the most frequently reported one was using medication as needed (78.1%). On the other hand, lifestyle modifications gained less positive responses, such as following a consistent sleep schedule (54.0%), stress management techniques (49.5%), and a specific diet (34.0%). However, 146 patients (28.3%) declared that they did not actively manage their migraine triggers at all (Table 3).
Understanding patients’ awareness of migraine triggers, management strategies, and the guidance they receive from healthcare professionals is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes, minimizing the frequency of attacks, and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals with migraine.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the knowledge of a sample of patients with migraine regarding triggers, strategies for managing these triggers, and the information provided by physicians about potential triggers and effective management approaches.
The current findings highlight gaps in current migraine management paradigms. Although 58.3% of study participants reported that their physicians had discussed migraine triggers with them, and 63.1% said their physicians had addressed lifestyle changes to help reduce migraines, only 43% felt they had sufficient knowledge about migraine triggers. Furthermore, among the strategies reported by participants for managing their migraines, the vast majority (78.1%) indicated they relied on medications when necessary. Additionally, 54.0% followed a consistent sleep schedule, 49.5% used stress management techniques, 34% adhered to a specific diet, and 28.3% reported not actively managing their migraine triggers because they did not know how to do so.
This may indicate a lack of effective communication between healthcare providers and their patients. Specifically, it suggests that only some physicians may be discussing migraine triggers and lifestyle modifications, and even then, the information provided might not be sufficient, clear, or properly understood. As a result, patients may lack sufficient knowledge or fail to apply what they have learned practically.
It is worth noting that the degree of patients’ awareness varied across the wide range of the different triggers studied. Stress, in particular, got the highest awareness level (93.4%). This finding agreed with a meta-analysis, which reported that stress is the most common perceived trigger by patients with migraine [17]. Stress yields dysregulations in the autonomic nervous and neuroendocrine systems that, over time, may increase the sensitization of nociceptors [18]. Yet, only 68.7% of our patients acknowledged that their physician discussed stress management techniques with them. Hence, some experts urge the integration of mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques in migraine management, by which patients with migraine can learn how to manage surrounding stressors and regulate their emotions in response to them [19, 20]. Regrettably, 49.5% of our patients declared their utilization of stress-coping strategies.
Sleep disruption was identified as the second common perceived migraine trigger by a meta-analysis conducting by Pellegrino, Davis-Martin [17]. Expectedly, the current results followed the same path, being well-recognized by most of the participants. Moreover, sleep hygiene improvement was the most frequently discussed lifestyle aspect, as reported by 78.1%. A previous meta-analysis praised the positive effects of different psychological sleep interventions that significantly reduced migraine frequency and severity [21]. Notwithstanding, only 54.0% of the surveyed patients followed a consistent sleep schedule.
Based on a prior report, between 12 and 60% of migraine patients cite foods as triggers [22]. Yet, the proportions of perceived certain foods as a trigger may vary worldwide due to geographical variations in cultural and dietary habits [23]. In the current study, approximately 40% of the patients were aware of common food triggers, including aged cheese, chocolate, and caffeinated beverages. However, a much lower number recognized nuts and citrus fruits as migraine triggers. Fasting or missing meals was another commonly perceived trigger for migraine, as identified by 62.7%. Perhaps practicing Ramadan fasting in Egypt, where the majority of its residents are Muslims, is sufficient to explain the higher level of awareness of this trigger compared to rates reported in other countries [23]. Hypoglycemia, dehydration, and caffeine withdrawal are potential contributing factors [24, 25].
Menstrual cycle and hormonal medications gained another high percentage of awareness (72.4% and 60.0%, respectively). The female predominance in the surveyed sample may account for these findings and reflect past personal experiences they may have had. Hormonal fluctuations, particularly changes in estrogen levels, are well-established triggers for migraine. During the perimenopausal period, women may experience more frequent and severe migraine attacks, which may ease after menopause as hormone levels stabilize [26]. Likewise, some women may experience an exacerbation of their migraines, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, and find relief after the first trimester has passed. However, it should be noted that sleep disturbance and stress during pregnancy can also influence the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks [27].
A headache diary is one of the most effective tools for reliable triggers identification [28]. However, the present study observed a very low rate of patients keeping a detailed migraine diary to track their triggers (18%) compared to the adherence rates estimated by Ramsey, Ryan [29] in their systematic review (83–95%). Hence, understanding the barriers to headache diary adherence is a challenging research question that awaits an answer through future studies.
Finally, the current findings hold the key to optimizing treatment efficacy and outcomes in migraine management by embracing a personalized approach that tailors healthy lifestyle recommendations based on an individual’s perception of his own triggers. Empowering patients with in-depth knowledge about migraine triggers and the potential benefits of adopting the recommended lifestyle modifications is imperative for informed decision-making and active contribution to their treatment plans. It is worth noting that the counseling tailored to migraine patients must be primarily based on the concept of coping rather than avoidance of triggers, which may facilitate the process of unpleasant commitment to these lifestyle recommendations [30]. Moreover, the use of tools such as headache diaries and mobile tracking applications can enhance trigger identification accuracy, supporting both patients and clinicians in developing more effective and personalized management strategies.
However, while trigger identification and management are essential components of personalized care, it is important to acknowledge that there is no conclusive evidence of specific triggers for migraines, although a significant number of patients with migraines report that several factors may trigger their attacks. In some patients, the prodrome may induce behaviors that may be falsely perceived as triggers themselves. For instance, some may experience food cravings during their prodrome, leading them to falsely believe that their headaches are triggered by eating this food. Differentiating migraine triggers from prodromal symptoms is a critical research point for more appropriate migraine care [31].
To our knowledge, this study is the first to address not only patients’ knowledge about migraine triggers and their management but also whether healthcare professionals have discussed these triggers and management strategies with patients. However, there are some limitations to consider. One limitation is selection bias, as the survey was shared within migraine social media support groups. This means that the participants are likely to be more actively engaged in managing their condition compared to the general migraine patient population. Additionally, the reliance on self-reporting is another limitation, as patients may have varying degrees of accuracy in describing their experiences and management strategies, which could affect the reliability of the data.
Furthermore, the online survey format may limit generalizability by excluding individuals without internet access or digital literacy. Additionally, relying on self-identification to exclude healthcare professionals may have unintentionally excluded some participants without formal clinical training e.g.,. stretcher-bearers and orderlies. Finally, data on participants’ educational background, occupation, and the type of healthcare professional managing their condition were not collected. These variables might have provided additional context for interpreting the findings, but were omitted to keep the survey concise and reduce participant burden. Future research is encouraged to incorporate these factors to enhance the depth of analysis and improve the representativeness and applicability of the findings.
Addressing migraine triggers should be integrated with other therapeutic strategies to achieve more effective migraine management. Physicians should prioritize educating patients on how to identify and manage their triggers as a part of their treatment plan. However, assessing trigger factors can be challenging due to patients’ reliance on retrospective self-reporting, which may result in recall bias and inconsistent data. To overcome these limitations, the use of headache diaries or mobile tracking tools can support this by providing information that helps guide personalized approaches. Encouraging patient education and self-monitoring may reduce the need for abortive medications and lead to improved outcomes.
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Steiner TJ (2004) Lifting the burden: the global campaign against headache. Lancet Neurol 3(4):204–205
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Puledda F et al (2023) Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. J Neurol 270(7):3654–3666
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Peng KP, May A (2019) Migraine understood as a sensory threshold disease. Pain 160(7):1494–1501
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Goadsby PJ et al (2017) Pathophysiology of migraine: A disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97(2):553–622
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kelman L (2007) The triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 27(5):394–402
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ning J et al (2023) Exploring the cortical habituation in migraine patients based on contingent negative variation. Front Neurol 14:1–12
Coppola G et al (2013) Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 14(1):65
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sebastianelli G et al (2024) Insights from triggers and prodromal symptoms on how migraine attacks start: the threshold hypothesis. Cephalalgia 44(10):03331024241287224
Article Google Scholar
Schulte LH, Jürgens TP, May A (2015) Photo-, osmo- and phonophobia in the premonitory phase of migraine: mistaking symptoms for triggers? J Headache Pain 16:14
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP (2016) The impact of regular lifestyle behavior in migraine: a prevalence case-referent study. J Neurol 263(4):669–676
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Haghdoost F, Togha M (2022) Migraine management: Non-pharmacological points for patients and health care professionals. Open Med (Wars) 17(1):1869–1882
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aljaafari D et al (2021) Migraine prevalence, characteristics, triggers, and coping strategies among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 23(5):1–6
Wöber C et al (2006) Trigger factors of migraine and tension-type headache: experience and knowledge of the patients. J Headache Pain 7(4):188–195
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baldacci F et al (2013) How aware are migraineurs of their triggers? Headache 53(5):834–837
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Iliopoulos P et al (2015) Trigger factors in primary headaches subtypes: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary centre in Greece. BMC Res Notes 8:393
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP (2017) Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci 372:307–315
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pellegrino ABW et al (2018) Perceived triggers of primary headache disorders: A meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 38(6):1188–1198
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Sic A et al (2025) Chronic stress and headaches: the role of the HPA Axis and autonomic nervous system. Biomedicines 13(2):463
Napadow V (2020) The mindful migraine: does mindfulness-based stress reduction relieve episodic migraine? Pain 161(8):1685–1687
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Russo A et al (2019) Coping strategies in migraine without aura: A Cross-Sectional study. Behav Neurol 2019:p5808610
Article Google Scholar
Sullivan DP, Martin PR, Boschen MJ (2019) Psychological sleep interventions for migraine and Tension-Type headache: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Sci Rep 9(1):6411
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Finocchi C, Sivori G (2012) Food as trigger and aggravating factor of migraine. Neurol Sci 33(1):77–80
Article Google Scholar
Iba C et al (2023) Migraine triggers in Asian countries: a narrative review. Front Neurol 14:1169795
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Magdy R et al (2023) Prevalence, characteristics, and factors associated with caffeine-withdrawal headache during the first day of ramadan. Headache 63(3):360–367
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ragab AH et al (2021) Changes in migraine characteristics over 30 days of ramadan fasting: A prospective study. Headache 61(10):1493–1498
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Waliszewska-Prosół M et al (2025) Menopause, perimenopause, and migraine: Understanding the intersections and implications for treatment. Neurol Therapy 14(3):665–680
Article Google Scholar
Lackovic M et al (2023) Exploring the connection between migraines and pregnancy: the impact of physical activity on symptom management. Med (Kaunas) 60(1):49
Minen M et al (2023) Headache providers’ perspectives of headache diaries in the era of increasing technology use: a qualitative study. Front Neurol 14:1270555
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ramsey RR et al (2014) Treatment adherence in patients with headache: a systematic review. Headache 54(5):795–816
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martin P (2010) Managing headache triggers: think ‘coping’ not ‘avoidance’. Cephalalgia 30(5):634–637
Sebastianelli G et al (2024) Insights from triggers and prodromal symptoms on how migraine attacks start: the threshold hypothesis. Cephalalgia 44(10):3331024241287224
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Download references
Internal Medicine Department- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
Alaa Elmazny
Neurology Department- Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Alaa Elmazny, Rehab Magdy, Wesam Osama & Haidy Elshebawy
Neurology department, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
Mona Hussein
Internal Medicine Department, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
Ahmed Yehia Ismaeel
Neurology Department, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed Essmat
Medical student, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Karim Essam Elbeltagy
Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
Shrouk Mohamed Mohamed Hussein, Nahed Shaban Hassan & Nada Mamdouh Elbehiry
Anesthesiology & SICU department, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
Hebatallah N. Abdelazeem
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
A.E., H.E. and R.M.: research idea, Manuscript writing and revision, M.H., A.E. and A.Y.I.: Manuscript writing, K.E.E., S.M.M.H., N.S.H., H.N.A. and N.M.E. data acquisition, collection of samples MH: data analysis and interpretation. W.O.: Manuscript writing and submission. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Wesam Osama.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
Elmazny, A., Magdy, R., Hussein, M. et al. Migraine triggers and lifestyle modifications: an assessment of patients’ awareness and the role of healthcare providers in patient education. J Headache Pain 26, 189 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02107-y
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02107-y
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Collection
Advertisement
ISSN: 1129-2377
By using this website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions, Your US state privacy rights, Privacy statement and Cookies policy. Your privacy choices/Manage cookies we use in the preference centre.
© 2025 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Nature.